As a way through the inherent difficulty of following Jesus, some are suggesting that the followers of Jesus be “neutral.” They want to make Jesus, and therefore themselves, more palatable for the world. I understand the temptation. They want a Jesus who does not offend, rebuke, correct or direct. They think that neutrality is a growth strategy for their churches. And, because that Jesus, according to Scripture, does not exist, they set about making him in their own image. I hear and read it all the time, “Christians,” they say, “should render no statement on matters of justice or equity, they should remain neutral.” My question is, where in Matthew, Mark, Luke and John do we see or hear Jesus be neutral? Jesus is not neutral. The prophets before him were not neutral. The followers of Jesus that we call the saints, were not neutral. They were for human dignity, for love, for equity, for justice in the real world. To be a follower of Jesus is to be for Jesus-what he actually said and did. Said another way, it is to be biased as Jesus was biased. Biased for the poor, the outcast, the oppressed, the sick and the sinful. Jesus was not neutral, neither was he a political partisan or politically expedient. He did not measure his impact by popularity. Remember, in the year before his death, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was voted the most hated man in America. It is illogical to think you can get flowers without disturbing the dirt! John, Jesus’ cousin, proclaimed baptism and repentance of sins. He was for a new beginning with God and each other. He was not neutral.
For People with Bishop Rob Wright
The podcast expands on Bishop’s For Faith devotional, drawing inspiration from the life of Jesus to answer 21st-century questions.